Identity TIPR

Current Teacher Behaviors
1. Identity vs Confusion is the psychosocial crisis I feel is most prevalent in the class. Since our writing unit is tackling relevant social issues, students are having to determine their stances on them. I've noticed that several of them are extremely opinionated, to the degree that it sometimes feels like they're exhibiting their opinions in order for the whole class to see who they are and where they stand on both the social issues they're writing about as well as the education system as a whole. Others are trying to sort out their feelings on an issue, but social expectations from their parents and previous teachers still seem to shape their opinions and identity. The class seems to be split between Foreclosure and Moratorium. The former because I can hear parents' opinions coming out of some students' mouths each day, and moratorium for the more loudly opinionated ones who don't seem completely confident in their statements, but are trying to take a unique and personal stance. The teacher does try to help push students out of foreclosure and into moratorium by asking students what they personally think about an issue when he comes around to help workshop writing. He makes it clear he wants to hear the student's opinion, not his own or their parents. Students can be intimidated by having to come up with their own opinions and beliefs (especially on hot topic issues like immigration, gun control, and transgender identities), but I feel the teacher is encouraging them to begin or continue experimenting with independent thought to develop their own identity.
Student Needs
2. Breaking most of the students out of the Foreclosure stage seems to be the most relevant need right now. The students are all opinionated and strong-willed, but many don't carry that over to their writing. I believe this is because writing on hot topics issues like the ones listed above can be controversial and intimidating, and students may not want to rock the boat too much. Also, 2/3 of the class is mostly interested in just getting the assignments done for points, not to explore their identity or bolster critical thinking. Because of this, it's easy for students to take what they heard their parents or peers or former teachers say about an issue and just copy that down to complete the assignment and be done with it. I think having the narrative assignment be based around a large issue was a good move, but not a lot has been done to help students work through how they feel about it. I think more pre-writing/planning work could have been done to provide students an opportunity to list out various thoughts they have on an issue. That way, they could pull from that list of their own brainstorm ideas when they write the story rather than be rushing through it and copying and pasting outsiders' perspectives into it. Regardless, student voice and opinion is always valued and I think that helps encourage identity exploration. Students aren't punished for having the "wrong" viewpoint. They only need to show they thought through multiple perspectives, which I believe encourages identity exploration.
Plans for your Lesson
3. My lesson will be on characterization and voice, so individual identity is crucial. I think an approach I can take is to tell students if they can't come up with a fictional character to run through the characterization questionnaire I'll be giving them, that they should answer the questions on it about themselves instead. This would help them explicitly state some basic things about their perspective on the issue they plan to write about. They'll understand a little bit more about their current opinions and identity, and I can encourage them to add to those if they don't feel it's enough to show a strong perspective on the issue they plan to write about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metacognition TIPR

Piaget TIPR

Defining Learning